A recent ruling by a regional court in Düsseldorf, Germany, has favored R2 Semiconductor in its patent infringement case against Intel. The court found that Intel had infringed on R2’s patent that covers integrated voltage regulator technology. As a result, the court issued an injunction against the sales of select Intel processors, including the Core-series ‘Ice Lake,’ ‘Tiger Lake,’ ‘Alder Lake,’ and Xeon Scalable ‘Ice Lake Server’ processors, as well as PCs and servers based on these CPUs. While some of these processors have already been discontinued, Alder Lake chips are still available in retail and systems on shelves.
Despite the ruling, Intel’s current-generation processors, such as Core ‘Raptor Lake’ and Core Ultra ‘Meteor Lake,’ are not affected by the injunction. This limits the impact of the decision on Intel’s product line.
Intel has expressed disappointment with the verdict and intends to challenge the court’s decision. The company accuses R2 Semiconductor of being a patent troll and criticizes its litigation strategy. Intel argues that R2 has pursued serial lawsuits against large companies, including Intel, for financial gain.
R2 Semiconductor, on the other hand, welcomes the court’s decision and asserts its commitment to protecting its intellectual property. The CEO of R2, David Fisher, called the German court’s ruling a triumph for inventors and emphasized the importance of the global patent system in safeguarding their rights. Fisher claims that Intel had plans to invest in R2 in 2015 but later terminated the process. According to Fisher, Intel incorporated R2’s patented technology without attribution or compensation.
Intel’s accusation that R2 is a patent troll contradicts R2’s claim that Intel is the only entity it has ever sued for patent infringement. Fisher emphasizes that Intel is responsible for the chronic infringement of R2’s patents and accuses the company of spreading false narratives.
This court ruling sets a precedent in Germany and may potentially impact Intel’s market presence in the country. Nevertheless, Intel’s current-generation processors remain unaffected, providing some relief for the company. The legal battle between Intel and R2 Semiconductor continues, with both parties standing firm in their positions.
FAQ:
1. What is the recent ruling by a regional court in Düsseldorf, Germany?
– The ruling favors R2 Semiconductor in its patent infringement case against Intel, determining that Intel had infringed on R2’s patent for integrated voltage regulator technology.
2. Which Intel processors are affected by the court’s injunction?
– The court issued an injunction against the sales of select Intel processors, including the Core-series ‘Ice Lake,’ ‘Tiger Lake,’ ‘Alder Lake,’ and Xeon Scalable ‘Ice Lake Server’ processors, as well as PCs and servers based on these CPUs. However, some of these processors have already been discontinued, and only Alder Lake chips are still available in retail and systems on shelves.
3. Are Intel’s current-generation processors affected by the injunction?
– No, Intel’s current-generation processors, such as Core ‘Raptor Lake’ and Core Ultra ‘Meteor Lake,’ are not affected by the injunction.
4. How does Intel respond to the verdict?
– Intel expresses disappointment with the verdict and intends to challenge the court’s decision. The company accuses R2 Semiconductor of being a patent troll and criticizes its litigation strategy. Intel argues that R2 has pursued serial lawsuits against large companies for financial gain.
5. How does R2 Semiconductor respond to the court’s decision?
– R2 Semiconductor welcomes the court’s decision and emphasizes its commitment to protecting its intellectual property. The company claims that Intel incorporated their patented technology without attribution or compensation. R2’s CEO, David Fisher, states that Intel had plans to invest in R2 in 2015 but terminated the process.
6. What does R2 Semiconductor refute about Intel’s accusations?
– R2 Semiconductor refutes Intel’s accusation that they are a patent troll and claims that Intel is the only entity it has ever sued for patent infringement. Fisher emphasizes that Intel is responsible for chronic infringement and accuses the company of spreading false narratives.
7. What does the court ruling mean for Intel’s market presence in Germany?
– The court ruling sets a precedent in Germany and may potentially impact Intel’s market presence in the country. However, Intel’s current-generation processors remain unaffected, offering some relief for the company.
Definitions:
– Patent infringement: The unauthorized use, manufacture, or sale of a patented invention without the permission of the patent holder.
– Integrated voltage regulator technology: Technology that combines regulation functions within a circuit to efficiently manage the flow of voltage in electronic devices.
Suggested related links:
– Intel Official Website
– R2 Semiconductor Official Website