The utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Vietnam is gaining momentum. However, the journey is rife with obstacles, including limited capital, legal frameworks, cybersecurity, and a shortage of specialized human resources.
Vu Ngoc Son, Director of Technical Services at the National Cyber Security Technology Company, emphasized the importance of legal corridors. He believes firmly established legal frameworks act much like runways for airplanes, guiding them to accelerate in the right direction. Such legal frameworks are not intended to impede progress but to ensure that AI activities are harmoniously aligned with human and societal benefits. The aim is not to restrict AI’s freedom but to channel its development towards the most advantageous outcomes for users and communities.
Moreover, Hoang Nam Tien, Vice President of FPT University Council, warned of the excessive misuse of AI systems. He highlighted the hazardous practices of software engineers using chatbots like ChatGPT to generate code, potentially leading to a breach of confidential information. Similarly, the practice of uploading sensitive company financial reports to ChatGPT poses a significant data security risk. He also pointed out that some students are resorting to AI for their academic assignments, including scientific reports, which raises ethical concerns.
Despite these challenges, Vietnam has not yet established AI-specific legislation. This reflects the broader reality that the law typically lags behind the pace of technological advances. Nonetheless, given the potential pitfalls of AI application, Tien calls for immediate managerial attention to AI use, advocating for adaptive regulatory barriers that match the level of understanding.
Lê Hồng Việt, CEO of FPT Smart Cloud, remarked that while Vietnam has formulated an AI strategy, ethical and legislative aspects remain underdeveloped. Globally, the debate on AI governance persists, and even comprehensive regulations like the EU’s do not cover all cases, given AI’s novelty. Countries are therefore adopting principles to guide AI development. He posed that AI training requires adherence to data integrity and caution against generating misleading or inaccurate content.
Nguyen Phu Tien, Deputy Director of the National Digital Transformation Agency, confirmed that Vietnam is proactively setting up legal parameters for virtual assistants and AI applications. This is evident from the recent electronic transaction law and ongoing ministerial efforts to draft relevant decrees and circulars.
This action aligns with the government’s 2030 strategy for AI research, development, and application, as established in Prime Ministerial Decision No. 127/QĐ-TTg. The Ministry of Information and Communications has been entrusted with trialing large language models and virtual assistants, aiming to implement a benchmarking system for evaluating these technologies.
The Ministry of Public Security is working on enhancing laws protecting privacy, human rights, and security in the context of AI development. Concurrently, the Ministry of Justice is focusing on the legal responsibilities associated with AI operations. With these measures in place, Vietnam is steering towards a future where AI is developed responsibly and ethically.
Vietnam’s approach to AI legislation and ethics is a complex subject with both advantages and disadvantages to its various strategies and challenges. Here are some of the overarching factors:
Key Challenges and Controversies:
– Keeping abreast with the rapid pace of AI technological development.
– Establishing a strong legal framework that balances innovation with ethical considerations.
– Addressing the privacy concerns and potential misuse of AI in areas like security and data handling.
– Developing specialized human resources to meet the technical and ethical demands of the emerging AI landscape.
– Ensuring that AI does not exacerbate existing social and economic inequalities.
Advantages:
– Ethical and legal guidelines can help ensure that AI benefits all segments of society and does not infringe on individual rights.
– Legislation can help prevent misuse of AI that might lead to privacy breaches, discrimination, or other harmful outcomes.
– Regulating AI can foster trust in these technologies among the public and encourage responsible innovation by companies.
Disadvantages:
– Over-regulation might stifle innovation and slow down the growth of Vietnam’s AI industry.
– There may be a disconnect between legislators’ understanding of AI technologies and the realities of their application.
– Ethical guidelines may be difficult to enforce, especially in cases where AI’s decision-making processes are opaque.
Related Links:
It is important to only refer to legitimate sources for further information related to AI legislation and ethics, especially given the topic’s evolving nature. Remember to make sure the URLs are valid and do not include example.com links. For general insight into the landscape of AI governance:
AI policy and ethics at a global level:
– OECD
– World Economic Forum
Vietnam’s Government and Relevant Ministries for AI Strategy:
– Government of Vietnam
– Ministry of Information and Communications of Vietnam
– Ministry of Public Security of Vietnam
– Ministry of Justice of Vietnam
Remember, the discussion around AI legislation and ethics is dynamic and region-specific. Therefore, while referring to these sources can give a broader perspective, understanding how they translate into local action within Vietnam is crucial for an accurate assessment of the situation.
The source of the article is from the blog macholevante.com