The rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have prompted calls for immediate legislation to restrain generative AI, with concerns raised by Japan’s largest telecommunications company, NTT, and the country’s biggest newspaper, Yomiuri Shimbun Group Holdings. This AI manifesto, set to be released on Monday, emphasizes the potential risks associated with unchecked AI development, highlighting the potential collapse of democracy and social order.
While acknowledging the benefits of generative AI in improving productivity, the manifesto takes a skeptical view of the technology. It argues that AI tools have already begun to undermine human dignity due to their manipulation of user attention without considering ethics or accuracy. To prevent an undesirable outcome, such as the outbreak of wars, the manifesto calls for immediate action in the form of legislation to safeguard elections and national security against potential abuse of generative AI.
This global concern over the regulation of AI is gaining momentum, with the European Union leading the way. The recently passed EU law requires developers of powerful AI models to conduct safety evaluations and notify regulators of any serious incidents. The law also prohibits the use of emotion-recognition AI in schools and workplaces. In the United States, the Biden administration has invoked emergency federal powers to enhance oversight, compelling major AI companies to report developments that pose a significant risk to national security. AI safety institutes, led by respective governments, have been established in the U.S., U.K., and Japan to develop AI guidelines.
Despite these endeavors, democratic nations face challenges in regulating AI-powered speech, particularly on social media platforms, while upholding constitutional protections for free speech.
NTT and Yomiuri Shimbun have expressed their concern for public discourse as the main driving force behind their manifesto. Both companies hold significant influence in shaping policy in Japan. Notably, the Japanese government retains about one-third ownership of NTT, which was once a state-controlled phone monopoly. Yomiuri Shimbun, with a morning circulation of approximately six million copies, is the most widely-read newspaper in Japan. Its conservative editorial line has played a role in encouraging the ruling Liberal Democratic Party to increase military spending and strengthen the nation’s alliance with the U.S.
The executives of NTT and Yomiuri Shimbun have been studying the impact of generative AI since last year in collaboration with researchers from Keio University. The newspaper’s news pages and editorials regularly address concerns surrounding artificial intelligence. In a December editorial, it emphasized the potential risks of advanced AI systems, expressing concerns over the proliferation of AI models capable of instructing people on weapon-making or spreading discriminatory ideas. It also highlighted the risks associated with sophisticated manipulated videos that falsely depict politicians speaking.
While NTT actively engages in AI research and offers generative AI products to business customers, it acknowledges that the technology carries significant risks if used maliciously to manipulate public opinion. The company maintains collaborations with major U.S. tech giants.
In conclusion, the urgent need for regulating generative AI has become a shared concern among industry leaders and policymakers worldwide. Efforts are underway to strike a balance between harnessing the benefits of AI and safeguarding democratic values, public discourse, and national security. By recognizing the potential risks and implementing appropriate legislation, societies can navigate the complex landscape of AI development and ensure a future where these technologies are used responsibly and ethically.
FAQ
What is generative artificial intelligence?
Generative artificial intelligence refers to AI systems capable of creating new content, such as text, images, or videos, based on patterns and data it has learned. These systems use complex algorithms to generate original and creative outputs.
Why is there a need to regulate generative AI?
Regulating generative AI is necessary to prevent potential misuse and abuses of this technology. Without appropriate safeguards, generative AI can be used to manipulate public opinion, compromise national security, and infringe upon ethical considerations.
How are democratic nations approaching AI regulation?
Democratic nations, including the European Union and the United States, are striving to establish regulations to ensure the responsible development and use of AI. These regulations aim to balance the benefits of AI while safeguarding democratic values, public discourse, and individual rights. Government-led initiatives, collaborations with tech giants, and specialized AI safety institutes are being established to create guidelines and frameworks for ethical AI practices.
Sources:
– European Union AI Regulations: exampledomain.com
– Biden Administration AI Oversight: exampledomain.com
The rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have prompted calls for immediate legislation to restrain generative AI. Concerns have been raised by Japan’s largest telecommunications company, NTT, and the country’s biggest newspaper, Yomiuri Shimbun Group Holdings. This AI manifesto, set to be released on Monday, emphasizes the potential risks associated with unchecked AI development, highlighting the potential collapse of democracy and social order.
Generative AI refers to AI systems capable of creating new content, such as text, images, or videos, based on patterns and data it has learned. These systems use complex algorithms to generate original and creative outputs.
While acknowledging the benefits of generative AI in improving productivity, the manifesto takes a skeptical view of the technology. It argues that AI tools have already begun to undermine human dignity due to their manipulation of user attention without considering ethics or accuracy. To prevent undesirable outcomes, such as the outbreak of wars, the manifesto calls for immediate action in the form of legislation to safeguard elections and national security against potential abuse of generative AI.
This global concern over the regulation of AI is gaining momentum, with the European Union leading the way. The recently passed EU law requires developers of powerful AI models to conduct safety evaluations and notify regulators of any serious incidents. The law also prohibits the use of emotion-recognition AI in schools and workplaces. Efforts are underway to strike a balance between harnessing the benefits of AI and safeguarding democratic values, public discourse, and national security.
In the United States, the Biden administration has invoked emergency federal powers to enhance oversight, compelling major AI companies to report developments that pose a significant risk to national security. AI safety institutes, led by respective governments, have been established in the U.S., U.K., and Japan to develop AI guidelines.
Regulating generative AI is necessary to prevent potential misuse and abuses of this technology. Without appropriate safeguards, generative AI can be used to manipulate public opinion, compromise national security, and infringe upon ethical considerations.
Democratic nations, including the European Union and the United States, are striving to establish regulations to ensure the responsible development and use of AI. These regulations aim to balance the benefits of AI while safeguarding democratic values, public discourse, and individual rights.
NTT and Yomiuri Shimbun have expressed their concern for public discourse as the main driving force behind their manifesto. Both companies hold significant influence in shaping policy in Japan. The Japanese government retains about one-third ownership of NTT, which was once a state-controlled phone monopoly. Yomiuri Shimbun, with a morning circulation of approximately six million copies, is the most widely-read newspaper in Japan.
The executives of NTT and Yomiuri Shimbun have been studying the impact of generative AI since last year in collaboration with researchers from Keio University. The newspaper’s news pages and editorials regularly address concerns surrounding artificial intelligence. In a December editorial, it emphasized the potential risks of advanced AI systems, expressing concerns over the proliferation of AI models capable of instructing people on weapon-making or spreading discriminatory ideas.
Despite these endeavors, democratic nations face challenges in regulating AI-powered speech, particularly on social media platforms, while upholding constitutional protections for free speech. Efforts are underway to strike a balance between protecting free speech and preventing the negative consequences of AI-generated content.
NTT actively engages in AI research and offers generative AI products to business customers. However, the company acknowledges the significant risks that the technology carries if used maliciously to manipulate public opinion. As such, collaborations with major U.S. tech giants aim to ensure responsible AI practices.
In conclusion, the urgent need for regulating generative AI has become a shared concern among industry leaders and policymakers worldwide. Efforts are underway to strike a balance between harnessing the benefits of AI and safeguarding democratic values, public discourse, and national security. By recognizing the potential risks and implementing appropriate legislation, societies can navigate the complex landscape of AI development and ensure a future where these technologies are used responsibly and ethically.
Sources:
– European Union AI Regulations: exampledomain.com
– Biden Administration AI Oversight: exampledomain.com
The source of the article is from the blog zaman.co.at