Wisconsin legislators are poised to vote on measures aimed at regulating artificial intelligence (AI) as the November elections draw near. The proposals cover various aspects, including disclaimers in political ads, penalties for manufacturing and possessing AI-generated images of child sexual abuse, and auditing the use of AI in state agencies.
One of the bipartisan measures up for discussion requires political candidates and groups to include disclaimers in advertisements that utilize AI technology. Supporters of the proposal include organizations like the League of Women Voters, the state’s newspaper associations, and broadcaster associations. Meanwhile, another proposal authored by Republicans seeks to criminalize the manufacturing and possession of AI-generated images of child sexual abuse, carrying a potential prison sentence of up to 25 years. It is worth noting that existing state law already addresses the physical production and possession of such images, but fails to account for their digital counterparts.
Additionally, lawmakers are considering a bill that calls for audits of AI usage within state agencies, providing them until 2030 to develop plans for reducing positions. By 2026, agencies must present legislators with reports highlighting which roles AI can potentially enhance and the progress made so far. It is crucial to mention that the bill does not establish specific workforce reduction goals and does not explicitly advocate for replacing human employees with AI systems. Instead, its focus is on identifying efficiencies amidst labor shortages.
The regulation of AI has gained attention across the United States, with numerous states introducing bills related to AI over the past couple of years. Some states, including Texas, North Dakota, West Virginia, and Puerto Rico, have established advisory bodies to examine AI systems used by their state agencies. Others, like Louisiana, have formed committees to assess AI’s impact on state operations, procurement, and policy. The Federal Communications Commission has recently prohibited robocalls utilizing AI-generated voices, following incidents involving AI-generated robocalls imitating President Joe Biden’s voice during New Hampshire’s primary election.
While generative AI tools, such as voice-cloning software and image generators, are already being utilized in elections globally, comprehensive federal legislation regarding AI in political campaigns is yet to materialize. The Biden administration has issued non-binding guidance on using AI technology in 2022, outlining broad objectives. As AI continues to advance, its potential to influence individuals and disseminate disinformation has drawn both fascination and concern.
FAQ Section:
Q: What measures are Wisconsin legislators voting on regarding AI regulation?
A: Wisconsin legislators are considering measures that cover various aspects of AI regulation, including disclaimers in political ads, penalties for manufacturing and possessing AI-generated images of child sexual abuse, and auditing the use of AI in state agencies.
Q: What is one of the proposed measures for regulating AI?
A: One of the proposed measures requires political candidates and groups to include disclaimers in advertisements that utilize AI technology.
Q: Who supports the proposal for disclaimers in AI-based political advertisements?
A: Supporters of the proposal include organizations like the League of Women Voters, the state’s newspaper associations, and broadcaster associations.
Q: What does the proposal authored by Republicans seek to criminalize?
A: The proposal authored by Republicans aims to criminalize the manufacturing and possession of AI-generated images of child sexual abuse.
Q: What is the potential prison sentence for possessing AI-generated images of child sexual abuse under the proposed measure?
A: The proposed measure carries a potential prison sentence of up to 25 years.
Q: What does the bill regarding AI usage in state agencies call for?
A: The bill calls for audits of AI usage within state agencies and provides until 2030 to develop plans for reducing positions.
Q: What is the focus of the bill on AI usage in state agencies?
A: The bill focuses on identifying efficiencies amidst labor shortages and does not explicitly advocate for replacing human employees with AI systems.
Q: Which states have introduced bills related to AI regulation?
A: Several states, including Texas, North Dakota, West Virginia, and Puerto Rico, have introduced bills related to AI regulation.
Q: What has the Federal Communications Commission recently prohibited?
A: The Federal Communications Commission has recently prohibited robocalls utilizing AI-generated voices.
Q: What has the Biden administration issued regarding AI technology?
A: The Biden administration has issued non-binding guidance on using AI technology in 2022, outlining broad objectives.
Definitions:
– AI: Artificial Intelligence refers to the ability of computer systems to perform tasks that typically require human intelligence, such as visual perception, speech recognition, and decision-making.
– Disclaimers: Statements that clarify or disavow certain claims or responsibilities.
– Generative AI: AI systems that can create new content, such as voice-cloning software and image generators.
– Non-binding: Not having the force of a binding agreement or law.
Suggested related links:
– Federal Communications Commission
– Biden administration’s guidance on AI technology
– Ballotpedia’s Artificial Intelligence Policy portal
The source of the article is from the blog qhubo.com.ni