AI-generated Books Flood Amazon, Targeting Authors

Summary: The rise of AI-generated content continues to impact Amazon, with an increasing number of low-quality books flooding the platform. These AI-generated books often imitate the titles and content of legitimate authors’ works, causing confusion among buyers. This trend has affected notable AI researchers such as Melanie Mitchell and Fei-Fei Li, whose books have been imitated by AI-generated knock-offs. Amazon has responded by taking down these imitations, citing violations of their content guidelines. However, the problem persists, with AI-generated book summaries also appearing on the platform. These summaries, though marked as such, offer little value to readers and are likely also AI-generated. Authors and experts in the publishing industry have raised concerns about the prevalence of these spammy AI-generated books and the impact they have on legitimate authors. Despite efforts by Amazon to limit the number of books authors can upload per day, this issue persists. Authors report finding these summaries online just days after their own books are published. The legality of these AI-generated imitations is also contentious, as copyright law primarily focuses on word-for-word plagiarism rather than imitation or summarization. Ultimately, Amazon and authors continue to grapple with how best to combat this problem as AI-generated content becomes increasingly prevalent.

Authors Dealing with Flood of AI-Generated Imitations on Amazon

AI-generated content continues to plague Amazon, with a surge in low-quality books flooding the online marketplace. These books, often imitations of legitimate authors’ works, are causing confusion among buyers and frustration for the targeted authors. Noted AI researcher Melanie Mitchell recently discovered an AI-generated version of her book, published under the same title, on Amazon. The imitation was only 45 pages long and poorly written. Further analysis confirmed that the book was 99 percent likely AI-generated. Mitchell’s experience is not unique, as other AI researchers like Fei-Fei Li have also been targeted by AI-generated knock-offs.

Amazon, upon being notified of these imitations, promptly took them down, citing violations of their content guidelines. However, the problem persists, as AI-generated book summaries are also flooding the platform. These summaries often provide little value to readers and are likely also AI-generated. The rise of generative AI has fueled the expansion of the spammy summary industry, as large language models are capable of producing rapid summaries of works they are fed.

The impact on authors has been significant, with some finding AI-generated summaries of their books available for sale on Amazon within days of their book’s release. Writers like Sarah Stankorb, author of “Disobedient Women: How a Small Group of Faithful Women Exposed Abuse, Brought Down Powerful Pastors, and Ignited an Evangelical Reckoning,” have expressed frustration and dismay at the poor quality and blatant imitation of their work. The prevalence of these AI-generated imitations raises questions about the legal recourse authors have against such practices. Copyright scholars argue that as long as the imitations do not engage in explicit word-for-word plagiarism, they may be considered legal. However, some intellectual property experts are skeptical of this argument, noting the substantial difference between AI-generated imitations and legitimate summarization practices, such as CliffsNotes.

As the prevalence of AI-generated content continues to grow, Amazon and authors are left grappling with how best to combat this issue and protect the integrity of published works.

The source of the article is from the blog revistatenerife.com

Privacy policy
Contact