Summary: OpenAI and its major supporter, Microsoft, are currently dealing with legal battles as multiple lawsuits accuse them of using copyrighted material without permission to train OpenAI’s language models. OpenAI recently noted in its written evidence to the House of Lords that training AI models without copyrighted materials is nearly impossible in today’s digital landscape. The company asserts that it adheres to copyright laws, but there is still room for improvement in supporting and empowering creators. OpenAI is actively working on mechanisms to allow publishers to prevent web crawlers from accessing their websites and is engaging in discussions with rightsholders to find mutually beneficial agreements. While OpenAI did not specifically address all the lawsuits filed against it, the company did respond to The New York Times’ claims, stating that the publication had failed to provide the full story. OpenAI revealed that it had been working on a potential partnership with The Times, granting access to its reporting. OpenAI accuses The Times of manipulating prompts and cherry-picking examples to create a misleading portrayal of the situation. Despite the current legal challenges, the company hopes to establish a constructive collaboration with the publication.
Title: OpenAI and Microsoft Face Legal Battles Over Copyright Allegations
OpenAI and its primary backer, Microsoft, are currently embroiled in a series of lawsuits that allege the unauthorized utilization of copyrighted works in training OpenAI’s language models. Recognizing the inevitability of incorporating copyrighted materials, OpenAI emphasized in its statement to the House of Lords that today’s leading AI models cannot be adequately trained without accessing such resources. While OpenAI maintains a commitment to complying with copyright laws, it acknowledges the need for further support and empowerment of creators in the process.
To address these concerns, OpenAI is actively developing mechanisms to allow publishers to prevent OpenAI’s web crawler, GPTBot, from accessing their websites. Additionally, the company is engaging in discussions with rightsholders to establish mutually beneficial agreements, enabling them to opt out of the model training as necessary.
While specific lawsuits were left unaddressed by OpenAI, the company did respond to The New York Times’ allegations regarding the unauthorized use of their news articles. OpenAI vehemently disagreed with The Times’ claims, asserting that the publication failed to present the full story. OpenAI revealed that negotiations were underway for a potential partnership with The Times, allowing access to its reporting. Surprisingly, OpenAI discovered the lawsuit through The Times’ own publication, indicating ongoing communication until December 19.
The legal complaint filed by The Times referenced instances where ChatGPT provided users with excerpts from paywalled articles. OpenAI disputed these claims, accusing The Times of intentional prompt manipulation and selective examples to create an inaccurate portrayal of the situation. OpenAI maintains that The Times’ lawsuit lacks validity, highlighting its aspiration for a constructive and collaborative alliance with the publication.
As the legal battles continue, OpenAI seeks to bridge the gap between AI development and copyright protection, fostering an environment that respects creators while pushing the boundaries of artificial intelligence.
The source of the article is from the blog yanoticias.es