OpenAI, the company behind the popular ChatGPT AI tool, has reportedly made a plea to the British parliament, requesting permission to use copyrighted works for free. According to OpenAI, it is “impossible” to train its artificial intelligence model without access to such data. The company argues that copyright laws cover almost all forms of human expression, including blog posts, photographs, software code, and government documents, making it essential for their AI models to utilize copyrighted materials.
OpenAI emphasizes that restricting training data solely to public domain books and ancient drawings would only yield limited results and fail to meet the needs of modern citizens. Since the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022, OpenAI has faced lawsuits from various entities, including The New York Times, celebrities, and authors such as Margaret Atwood and George RR Martin. These legal actions claim that OpenAI used their texts without permission for training purposes.
The New York Times alleges that ChatGPT’s training process constitutes “massive copyright infringement, commercial exploitation, and misappropriation” of the newspaper’s intellectual property. It argues that the AI tool now competes with the Times as an information source. Rachel Geman, an attorney representing the Authors’ Guild and several authors in a class-action suit against OpenAI, argues that without access to copyrighted works, OpenAI’s product would be significantly different. Geman states that copying authors’ works without permission or compensation threatens writers’ livelihoods as a whole.
In response to these legal challenges, OpenAI is seeking partnerships with publishers and has already struck deals with the Associated Press and media giant Axel Springer to gain access to their content. The company claims to respect the rights of content creators and owners and expresses its commitment to working with them to ensure they benefit from AI technology and new revenue models.
OpenAI maintains that it complies with copyright laws and argues that training AI models does not violate those laws. The company believes that copyright law does not explicitly prohibit the use of copyrighted works for training purposes.
The source of the article is from the blog lanoticiadigital.com.ar