Summary: AMD’s Ryzen 8840U and Intel’s Core Ultra 155H are two competing mobile processors that offer excellent performance in their respective domains. While AMD’s chip boasts a superior neural processing unit, Intel’s chip has made significant advancements in GPU capabilities. Let’s delve into the comparisons and see how these processors stack up against each other.
AMD’s Ryzen 8840U processor, part of the Hawk Point series, has caught the attention of tech enthusiasts with its AI processing prowess. The neural processing unit integrated into the chip delivers a 60% boost in performance compared to its predecessor, the Ryzen 7040 Phoenix series. This enhancement enables exceptional support for on-device AI processing, adding a new dimension to mobile computing.
Contrary to expectations, AMD claims that its Ryzen 7 8840U processor can outperform Intel’s newly launched Core Ultra 7 155H chip in various tests, despite the latter being based on Intel’s advanced “Meteor Lake” architecture. While it is advisable to view benchmarks provided by chip makers with skepticism, AMD asserts that the Ryzen 7 8840U excels in select gaming, productivity, and AI benchmarks when compared to systems with comparable hardware.
The technical specifications of the two chips reveal some notable differences. The Ryzen 7 8840U features eight Zen 4 CPU cores, offering a base frequency of 3.3 GHz and a maximum frequency of 5.1 GHz. On the other hand, the Core Ultra 7 155H boasts 16 cores and 22 threads, with six P-cores reaching up to 4.8 GHz, eight E-cores up to 3.8 GHz, and two LP-E-cores up to 2.5 GHz. In terms of GPU, the Ryzen 7 8840U includes a Radeon 780M with 12 RDNA 3 compute units running at up to 2.7 GHz, while the Core Ultra 7 155H comprises eight Xe cores operating at up to 2.25 GHz.
It is worth noting that Intel’s 14th-gen processors, utilizing the Meteor Lake architecture, introduce significant improvements over their Raptor Lake predecessors. With higher CPU core and thread counts, three-tier CPU design, and Intel Arc integrated graphics, Intel aims to deliver substantial graphics performance gains.
While AMD selectively chose benchmarks to highlight the Ryzen 7 8840U’s superiority, real-world results may vary depending on the specific activities and additional hardware in use. Nonetheless, it is evident that AMD’s current-gen mobile chips present a strong competition to Intel’s 2024 lineup, especially considering that Meteor Lake marks a substantial leap for Intel in GPU and NPU capabilities.
In conclusion, the clash between AMD’s Ryzen 8840U and Intel’s Core Ultra 155H paints a vibrant picture of the mobile processor landscape. Both chips have their strengths and weaknesses, and their performances excel in particular domains. Ultimately, users should carefully evaluate their requirements and choose the processor that best suits their needs.
The source of the article is from the blog oinegro.com.br