Summary: OpenAI and its financial backer Microsoft are facing a lawsuit filed by nonfiction authors Nicholas Basbanes and Nicholas Gage, who claim that their works were misused to train artificial-intelligence models such as the popular chatbot ChatGPT. The authors argue that their copyrights were infringed when their books were included as part of the data used to train OpenAI’s GPT large language model. This lawsuit adds to a series of similar cases where writers have accused tech companies of using their work without permission to train AI programs. The authors’ lawyer criticizes the companies for exploiting their works and profiting from a billion-dollar industry without providing any compensation.
In a recent development, OpenAI and its financial backer Microsoft have been hit with a lawsuit for allegedly misusing authors’ works to train artificial-intelligence models. Nonfiction authors Nicholas Basbanes and Nicholas Gage have filed a proposed class action complaint in Manhattan federal court, arguing that their copyrights were violated.
The authors claim that OpenAI included several of their books as part of the data used to train their GPT large language model, which powers popular AI-based services like the chatbot ChatGPT. The unauthorized use of their works, according to the authors, amounts to copyright infringement.
This lawsuit echoes a growing trend of legal actions brought by writers against tech companies for the alleged unauthorized use of their work to train AI programs. Previously, well-known figures like comedian Sarah Silverman and “Game of Thrones” author George R.R. Martin have filed similar lawsuits.
The New York Times also joined the wave of legal proceedings, suing OpenAI and Microsoft for using their journalists’ work to train AI applications. The inclusion of Basbanes and Gage as plaintiffs in this lawsuit highlights the concerns shared by both fiction and nonfiction authors.
Michael Richter, the lawyer representing Basbanes and Gage, expressed outrage at the situation, criticizing the companies for profiting from a billion-dollar industry without compensating the authors. The lawsuit reflects the authors’ desire for fair treatment and recognition of their intellectual property rights in an era of rapid AI development.
The source of the article is from the blog elperiodicodearanjuez.es