Midjourney, the renowned AI image synthesis model, has recently launched its latest version, Midjourney v6. With eager fans putting the alpha model to the test over the winter break, the results have been making waves on social media platforms. Users have been quick to recognize the significant improvements in detail compared to the previous version, v5.2, as well as a shift in the approach to prompting.
One particular highlight of Midjourney v6 is its ability to generate text, albeit in a rudimentary form. While it is not without its flaws, users have been amazed by the level of detail and scenery that the model produces. However, some have raised concerns about the high contrast and overly saturated nature of the generated images. Artists like Julie Wieland, who actively shares her Midjourney creations online, acknowledge the need to adjust their prompts and work with the new structures of the upgraded model.
Critics of Midjourney’s practices take issue with the model’s training methods. Midjourney trains its AI models using human-made artwork scraped from the web without permission, a controversial approach that has been discussed extensively in the AI community. The concerns about the impact of such technologies on artists have also been a topic of discussion in other contexts.
With the release of Midjourney v6, the question of whether there can ever be “too much detail” in an AI-generated image arises. Critics argue that some of the generated images surpass reality in an unrealistic manner. However, this aspect can be adjusted through careful prompting, allowing users to strike a balance between realism and artistic expression.
As Midjourney continues to innovate and push the boundaries of AI image synthesis, it remains to be seen how artists, AI enthusiasts, and critics will respond to the evolving capabilities and ethical considerations of such technologies.
The source of the article is from the blog meltyfan.es