Voice Actors Sue AI Startup for Unauthorized Use of Their Voices

AI Start-Up Faces Legal Battle Over Voice Cloning

Two professional voice actors have taken legal action against a San Francisco-based artificial intelligence startup, Lovo, in a Manhattan federal court. They accuse the company of duplicating their voices without consent for use in its AI voiceover technology. Paul Sky Lerman and Line Sage, the actors involved, are seeking compensation, alleging that Lovo tricked them into providing voice samples and later capitalized on their voices without permission, leading to a collective lawsuit demanding at least $5 million in damages due to fraud, false advertising, and violation of their publicity rights.

This incident adds to a growing list of lawsuits where tech firms are criticized for exploiting content, such as books, news stories, and song lyrics, to power their generative AI systems. The representatives for the aggrieved voice actors seek to prevent similar incidents from affecting others.

Delving into the case details, Lerman and Sage were contacted through Fiverr, a platform for freelancers, to supply voice recordings for what they were told were nondescript clients. Lerman was led to believe his voice would only serve for a “research project,” while Sage was informed that her voice was for “test scripts for radio ads.”

Contrary to these terms, Lerman discovered AI-generated versions of his voice in YouTube videos and a podcast discussing the perils of AI technology. Similarly, Sage’s recordings were used in promotional materials for Lovo. The revelation that their voices were being sold to subscribers under the names Kyle Snow and Sally Coleman prompted the lawsuit. In response to a cease-and-desist letter, Lovo reportedly downplayed the popularity and sales of the voiceovers in question.

No immediate comment from Lovo representatives has been forthcoming regarding the lawsuit.

Important Questions and Answers:

What rights do voice actors have regarding the use of their voices?
Voice actors, like other performers, have the right to control the use of their voice recordings and are typically protected under laws relating to copyright, performance rights, and the right of publicity or personality rights. Violation of these rights may constitute legal grounds for a lawsuit.

What challenges do AI voice replication technologies pose to voice actors?
AI voice replication technologies can threaten the livelihood of voice actors if the technology is used to circumvent hiring actors for new projects. Additionally, there are ethical concerns regarding consent and compensation when an actor’s voice is recorded and then used to generate new content without their approval.

What controversies are associated with AI voice cloning?
The primary controversies include potential misuse or misrepresentation of someone’s voice, the implications for deepfakes, and the unsettling blurring of lines between real and synthetic voices that can mislead listeners. Furthermore, there are ongoing debates about copyright, consent, and intellectual property rights in the context of AI-generated content.

Advantages and Disadvantages of AI Voice Cloning:

Advantages:
– Cost efficiency in producing content without repeated voice-actor sessions.
– Flexibility to generate voiceovers in multiple languages and accents.
– Availability to service users with disabilities such as visual impairment, using synthetic speech for accessibility.

Disadvantages:
– Ethical issues around consent and the authenticity of voice clones.
– Financial impact on voice actors due to potential loss of work and unauthorized use of their voices.
– Legal complexities related to copyright and performer’s rights.

Key Challenges or Controversies:
One of the significant challenges is balancing innovation in AI with the protection of individual rights. As the technology develops, it raises questions about the ownership of one’s voice and the distribution of benefits derived from AI. The need to establish clear regulations surrounding voice cloning technology is essential to prevent unauthorized use and to mediate conflicts that may emerge between technology companies and voice talent.

Relevant Links:
For updates on similar issues concerning technology, innovation, and law, you can visit news websites specifically focused on legal matters or tech industry updates, which can be found at the following links:
TechCrunch
Engadget
Reuters
The Verge

Please note that the lawsuit involving Lovo and the voice actors discussed in the article represents one of numerous potential cases where emerging technologies intersect with legal and ethical concerns, and these links can offer broader perspectives on such topics.

Privacy policy
Contact