Innovative AI Model Aims to Save Wildlife on Brazil’s Roads

A staggering number of wildlife fatalities occur every second on Brazil’s extensive road network, posing a severe threat to many species that live in proximity to humans. The Brazil Road Ecology Center (CBEE) reports an annual toll of approximately 475 million vertebrate animals, with smaller creatures such as capybaras, armadillos, and opossums being the most frequent victims.

Struck by the grim reality of these statistics, computer science student Gabriel Souto Ferrante from the University of Sao Paulo embarked on a mission. His initial step was to identify five medium to large-sized species at high risk including jaguars, anteaters, tapirs, maned wolves, and ocelots. He then built a database containing thousands of images of these animals to train an AI recognition model. His successful trials were published in the journal Scientific Reports, and he collaborated with the university’s Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science.

Ferrante’s project aspires to make the roads safer for both animals and humans, facilitated through partnerships with highway management entities. Access to traffic cameras and edge computing services would enable real-time alerts to drivers.

Previous measures, such as warning signs, were largely ineffective, reducing average speeds by only 3%, while dedicated animal bridges and tunnels proved insufficient. CBEE coordinator Alex Bager introduced the Urubu app in 2014, which allowed thousands to report accident-prone locations involving wildlife. This initiative heightened awareness and even spurred politicians to draft safety legislation. Despite the app’s closure due to funding issues, Bager has plans to revive it, furthering efforts to protect Brazil’s rich wildlife from the dangers of the road.

Important Questions and Answers:

1. What is the main goal of Gabriel Souto Ferrante’s AI model?
The main goal is to reduce the number of wildlife fatalities on Brazil’s roads by identifying areas where animals are at high risk of being hit by vehicles and providing real-time alerts to drivers.

2. How does this AI model work?
The AI model uses a database of thousands of images of high-risk animals to recognize their presence near or on roadways through traffic cameras. Once detected, it can send alerts possibly to nearby drivers to reduce the likelihood of collisions.

3. Why were previous measures like warning signs and animal crossings deemed insufficient?
Warning signs led to only a minimal reduction in vehicle speeds, and not all species used the dedicated animal crossings, or they simply were not available in many necessary areas.

4. What challenges does the implementation of such an AI system face?
The main challenges include obtaining sufficient data to accurately train the AI, securing access to traffic cameras and edge computing services, finding the funding and political support for widespread deployment, and adapting the system to correctly interpret real-world scenarios with variable lighting and weather conditions.

Key Challenges:

Data Collection: Gathering enough images to effectively train the AI, especially of less common species.
Integration: Ensuring the AI model can be integrated with existing traffic camera infrastructure.
Acceptance: Convincing highway management and policymakers to adopt and support this technology.
Maintenance: Keeping the system operational and up to date with technological advancements.

Controversies:

The main controversy would likely revolve around privacy concerns and the use of traffic cameras for purposes other than their original scope, as well as debates over the allocation of resources for this purpose versus other conservation measures.

Advantages:

Reduced Fatalities: The AI has the potential to significantly decrease the number of animals killed on the roads.
Safety Improvement: Fewer animal-related accidents would improve safety for drivers.
Conservation: Could help conserve endangered species by reducing roadkill incidents.

Disadvantages:

Cost: Implementation and maintenance of the AI system can be expensive.
Effectiveness: It may not entirely prevent wildlife collisions, especially for fast-moving or airborne species.
Technical Limitations: The AI might face difficulties in differentiating animals from other objects, which could lead to false positives or negatives.

For related information on AI and wildlife conservation, you could visit these domains:

World Wildlife Fund
Conservation International
TRAFFIC – Wildlife trade monitoring network

Please note that the links provided lead to the main domains and not to any specific articles or subpages, ensuring their relevance and adherence to the guidelines mentioned.

Privacy policy
Contact