Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) has proposed a new bill aimed at ensuring greater transparency in the training of generative artificial intelligence (AI) models. The legislation, known as the “Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act,” would require companies using copyrighted material to publicly disclose all the work they used to train their AI models.
According to the bill, individuals creating training datasets or making significant changes to existing datasets would need to submit a notice to the Register of Copyrights. This notice would include a detailed summary of any copyrighted works used and the URL of any publicly available material. The deadline for filing the notice would be no later than 30 days after the AI system becomes publicly available.
Importantly, the legislation would apply retroactively to AI systems that are already publicly available. Once the bill goes into effect, these systems would have 30 days to submit the required notice. The Register of Copyrights would then publish an online database accessible to the public, containing all the submitted notices.
Schiff believes that this legislation strikes a necessary balance between fostering innovation and upholding the rights of creators. He recognizes that AI has the potential to bring about significant changes in various aspects of society and emphasizes the need for ethical guidelines and protections. The Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act aims to respect the creative contributions of artists and content creators while promoting technological progress.
The introduction of this bill comes amidst rising concerns about the impact of AI on artists and content creators. Last week, over 200 artists, including well-known musicians like Billie Eilish, Nicki Minaj, and the Jonas Brothers, signed an open letter expressing their concerns about the use of AI in the music industry. They urged tech companies, AI developers, and digital music services to cease using AI technologies without proper consent, as they believed it could negatively affect artists’ revenue streams.
While acknowledging the potential of AI to enhance human creativity, the artists also stressed the importance of responsible AI use to safeguard privacy, identity, and livelihoods. Similar concerns have been raised by unions representing actors and writers in Hollywood. Both the SAG-AFTRA union and the Writers Guild of America have sought and obtained protections from AI during contract negotiations, highlighting the need to address the potential risks posed by AI technology.
The Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act seeks to address these concerns through greater transparency in AI training. By requiring companies to disclose their use of copyrighted material, the legislation aims to protect the rights and contributions of creators while ensuring that they are informed of how their work is being utilized in AI datasets.
FAQ:
Q: What is the purpose of the Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act?
A: The purpose of the bill is to enhance transparency in the training of generative AI models by requiring companies to publicly disclose the copyrighted work they use.
Q: How will the bill be enforced?
A: The bill proposes that individuals creating training datasets or making significant changes to existing datasets submit a notice to the Register of Copyrights, including a detailed summary of the copyrighted work used and the URL of any publicly available material.
Q: What happens if companies fail to comply with the disclosure requirements?
A: The bill does not specify penalties for non-compliance. However, it aims to establish a publicly accessible online database containing all the submitted notices.
Q: Why are artists and content creators concerned about AI?
A: Artists and content creators are concerned that the use of AI without proper consent could negatively impact their income and dilute royalty pools. They also want to ensure that AI is used responsibly to protect privacy, identity, and livelihoods.
Sources:
– The Hill
The Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act proposed by Rep. Adam Schiff aims to address the concerns surrounding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in training models by promoting transparency. While the bill focuses on ensuring that companies publicly disclose the copyrighted materials they utilize, it also highlights the need for ethical guidelines and protection of creators’ rights.
The introduction of this legislation comes at a time when artists and content creators have expressed growing concerns about the impact of AI on their industries. Over 200 artists, including well-known musicians such as Billie Eilish, Nicki Minaj, and the Jonas Brothers, signed an open letter raising their apprehensions about the use of AI in the music industry. They called on tech companies, AI developers, and digital music services to obtain proper consent before utilizing AI technologies, as they believe it could negatively affect artists’ revenue streams.
Similar concerns have been voiced by Hollywood unions representing actors and writers, such as SAG-AFTRA and the Writers Guild of America. These organizations have sought protections against AI in their contract negotiations, emphasizing the need to address the potential risks posed by AI technology.
The Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act seeks to address these concerns by establishing a requirement for companies to disclose their use of copyrighted materials in AI training datasets. By doing so, the legislation aims to protect the rights and contributions of creators while ensuring that they are aware of how their work is being utilized in AI systems.
The bill proposes that individuals creating training datasets or making significant changes to existing datasets submit a notice to the Register of Copyrights. This notice should include a detailed summary of the copyrighted works used and the URL of any publicly available material. The deadline for filing the notice would be no later than 30 days after the AI system becomes publicly available.
Additionally, the legislation would apply retroactively to AI systems that are already publicly available. These systems would have 30 days to submit the required notice once the bill goes into effect. To facilitate accessibility and transparency, the Register of Copyrights would publish an online database containing all the submitted notices.
While the bill does not specify penalties for non-compliance, its main goal is to foster transparency and accountability in AI training. It aims to strike a balance between innovation and the protection of creators’ rights, recognizing the transformative potential of AI while ensuring responsible use.
For more information on the Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act, you can refer to the article on The Hill.
The source of the article is from the blog guambia.com.uy