The League of Women Voters of New Hampshire has filed a lawsuit against a political consultant and telecom companies involved in an AI-generated robocall that urged voters not to participate in the state’s presidential primary. The lawsuit accuses the consultant, Steve Kramer, and the companies Life Corp. and Lingo Telecom of voter intimidation, coercion, and deception, which are in violation of federal and state laws, including the Voting Rights Act and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
The League of Women Voters of New Hampshire, a voting advocacy group, is taking legal action in order to hold these entities accountable. The lawsuit seeks to impose fines on the defendants and prevent them from producing or distributing any future robocalls generated with artificial intelligence. The aim of the lawsuit is to combat the attempts made to suppress the votes of New Hampshire citizens.
The president of the League of Women Voters of New Hampshire, Liz Tentarelli, emphasized the importance of providing accurate election information to voters, regardless of their party affiliation. She stated, “We will continue to advocate for New Hampshire voters and fight against malicious schemes to suppress the vote.”
This incident highlights the increasing prevalence and sophistication of generative AI, a technology that can automatically generate text, images, or sounds based on the data it is fed. In recent years, deepfakes created by generative AI have become more common on various social media platforms, allowing for the spread of misinformation and confusion. However, this robocall incident represents one of the first major known uses of AI to interfere with a U.S. presidential election, exposing the disruptive capabilities of this technology.
The League of Women Voters chapter, in their complaint, emphasized that the malicious use of artificial intelligence by bad faith actors poses a new and dangerous threat to American democracy. This unprecedented utilization of AI raises concerns about the potential for further interference with future elections, as the barrier to entry becomes lower and anyone with access to this technology can disseminate false information.
The defendants named in the lawsuit, namely Life Corp., Lingo Telecom, and Steve Kramer, as well as their representatives, have declined to comment on the matter. The investigation into the case is ongoing.
In response to the growing concerns surrounding the use of AI in robocalls, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has taken steps to address the issue. After the incident, the FCC unanimously adopted a ruling clarifying that generating a voice with AI for a robocall is illegal. FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel expressed the need to combat fraudsters who use AI-generated voices to deceive and manipulate individuals, stating, “We’re putting the fraudsters behind these robocalls on notice.”
While discussions about the regulation of generative AI have been slow to progress in Congress, European regulators have been more proactive in addressing the risks associated with this technology. It is crucial for legislation to catch up with the advancements in generative AI in order to protect the integrity of elections and prevent the spread of misinformation.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
1. What is the lawsuit against the political consultant and telecom companies about?
The lawsuit filed by the League of Women Voters of New Hampshire accuses a political consultant, Steve Kramer, and telecom companies Life Corp. and Lingo Telecom, of voter intimidation, coercion, and deception through an AI-generated robocall during the state’s presidential primary.
2. What are the laws violated in this case?
The lawsuit alleges violations of federal and state laws, including the Voting Rights Act and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
3. What is the objective of the lawsuit?
The lawsuit seeks to fine the defendants and prevent them from producing or distributing further AI-generated robocalls. The aim is to preserve the integrity of the electoral process and fight against attempts to suppress the vote.
4. What is generative AI?
Generative AI is a technology that can generate text, images, or sounds based on the data it is fed. It has become increasingly sophisticated in recent years and has the potential to create deepfake content, which can be used to spread misinformation and cause confusion.
5. Why is this robocall incident significant?
This incident represents one of the first major known uses of AI to interfere with a U.S. presidential election. It exposes the disruptive power of AI and highlights the potential for widespread confusion and chaos that can be caused by its misuse.
Sources:
– [FCC ruling on AI-generated voices](https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-clarifies-artificial-voice-robocall-rule)
– [The Washington Post article](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/04/09/deepfake-robocall-ai-lawsuit/)
The League of Women Voters of New Hampshire has filed a lawsuit against a political consultant and telecom companies involved in an AI-generated robocall that urged voters not to participate in the state’s presidential primary. The lawsuit accuses the consultant, Steve Kramer, and the companies Life Corp. and Lingo Telecom of voter intimidation, coercion, and deception, which are in violation of federal and state laws, including the Voting Rights Act and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
The League of Women Voters of New Hampshire, a voting advocacy group, is taking legal action in order to hold these entities accountable. The lawsuit seeks to impose fines on the defendants and prevent them from producing or distributing any future robocalls generated with artificial intelligence. The aim of the lawsuit is to combat the attempts made to suppress the votes of New Hampshire citizens.
The president of the League of Women Voters of New Hampshire, Liz Tentarelli, emphasized the importance of providing accurate election information to voters, regardless of their party affiliation. She stated, “We will continue to advocate for New Hampshire voters and fight against malicious schemes to suppress the vote.”
This incident highlights the increasing prevalence and sophistication of generative AI, a technology that can automatically generate text, images, or sounds based on the data it is fed. In recent years, deepfakes created by generative AI have become more common on various social media platforms, allowing for the spread of misinformation and confusion. However, this robocall incident represents one of the first major known uses of AI to interfere with a U.S. presidential election, exposing the disruptive capabilities of this technology.
The League of Women Voters chapter, in their complaint, emphasized that the malicious use of artificial intelligence by bad faith actors poses a new and dangerous threat to American democracy. This unprecedented utilization of AI raises concerns about the potential for further interference with future elections, as the barrier to entry becomes lower and anyone with access to this technology can disseminate false information.
The defendants named in the lawsuit, namely Life Corp., Lingo Telecom, and Steve Kramer, as well as their representatives, have declined to comment on the matter. The investigation into the case is ongoing.
In response to the growing concerns surrounding the use of AI in robocalls, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has taken steps to address the issue. After the incident, the FCC unanimously adopted a ruling clarifying that generating a voice with AI for a robocall is illegal. FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel expressed the need to combat fraudsters who use AI-generated voices to deceive and manipulate individuals, stating, “We’re putting the fraudsters behind these robocalls on notice.”
While discussions about the regulation of generative AI have been slow to progress in Congress, European regulators have been more proactive in addressing the risks associated with this technology. It is crucial for legislation to catch up with the advancements in generative AI in order to protect the integrity of elections and prevent the spread of misinformation.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
1. What is the lawsuit against the political consultant and telecom companies about?
The lawsuit filed by the League of Women Voters of New Hampshire accuses a political consultant, Steve Kramer, and telecom companies Life Corp. and Lingo Telecom, of voter intimidation, coercion, and deception through an AI-generated robocall during the state’s presidential primary.
2. What are the laws violated in this case?
The lawsuit alleges violations of federal and state laws, including the Voting Rights Act and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
3. What is the objective of the lawsuit?
The lawsuit seeks to fine the defendants and prevent them from producing or distributing further AI-generated robocalls. The aim is to preserve the integrity of the electoral process and fight against attempts to suppress the vote.
4. What is generative AI?
Generative AI is a technology that can generate text, images, or sounds based on the data it is fed. It has become increasingly sophisticated in recent years and has the potential to create deepfake content, which can be used to spread misinformation and cause confusion.
5. Why is this robocall incident significant?
This incident represents one of the first major known uses of AI to interfere with a U.S. presidential election. It exposes the disruptive power of AI and highlights the potential for widespread confusion and chaos that can be caused by its misuse.
Sources:
– FCC ruling on AI-generated voices
– The Washington Post article
The source of the article is from the blog j6simracing.com.br