Three authors, Brian Keene, Abdi Nazemian, and Stewart O’Nan, have filed a proposed class-action lawsuit against Nvidia, alleging copyright infringement. They claim that Nvidia used their copyrighted books without permission to train its NeMo AI platform, which is powered by Nvidia’s chips and used for simulating ordinary written language. The authors’ works were part of a dataset of approximately 196,640 books that were utilized in training NeMo. However, the dataset was taken down in October due to reported copyright infringement.
The authors argue that Nvidia’s takedown of the dataset is an admission of guilt, as it acknowledges that NeMo was trained using copyrighted material without authorization. They are seeking unspecified damages on behalf of individuals in the United States whose copyrighted works contributed to training NeMo’s large language models over the past three years. This includes works such as Keene’s “Ghost Walk,” Nazemian’s “Like a Love Story,” and O’Nan’s “Last Night at the Lobster.”
Nvidia has chosen not to comment on the lawsuit at this time, while the authors’ lawyers have yet to provide additional statements. This legal action adds Nvidia to the list of companies facing litigation over generative AI technology, including OpenAI and Microsoft. Generative AI has become increasingly popular but has also raised concerns about copyright infringement and intellectual property rights.
Nvidia’s NeMo AI platform is hailed as a fast and affordable solution for adopting generative AI. The company’s success in the field of artificial intelligence has made it a favorite among investors, with its stock price soaring by nearly 600% since the end of 2022, giving Nvidia a market value of nearly $2.2 trillion.
As the lawsuit unfolds, it further highlights the complex legal landscape surrounding AI and the need for clear guidelines regarding the usage of copyrighted material in training AI algorithms.
FAQ Section:
Q: Who has filed a class-action lawsuit against Nvidia?
A: Three authors named Brian Keene, Abdi Nazemian, and Stewart O’Nan have filed the lawsuit.
Q: What are they alleging?
A: They are alleging copyright infringement, claiming that Nvidia used their copyrighted books without permission to train its NeMo AI platform.
Q: What is NeMo AI platform used for?
A: NeMo AI platform is used for simulating ordinary written language.
Q: What was the dataset used in training NeMo?
A: The dataset used in training NeMo consisted of approximately 196,640 books.
Q: Why was the dataset taken down?
A: The dataset was taken down in October due to reported copyright infringement.
Q: Why do the authors argue that Nvidia’s takedown of the dataset is an admission of guilt?
A: The authors argue that the takedown acknowledges that NeMo was trained using copyrighted material without authorization.
Q: What damages are the authors seeking?
A: The authors are seeking unspecified damages on behalf of individuals in the United States whose copyrighted works contributed to training NeMo’s large language models over the past three years.
Q: Has Nvidia commented on the lawsuit?
A: Nvidia has chosen not to comment on the lawsuit at this time.
Q: Are there other companies facing litigation over generative AI technology?
A: Yes, other companies such as OpenAI and Microsoft are also facing litigation over generative AI technology.
Q: What concerns are raised about generative AI technology?
A: Generative AI technology has raised concerns about copyright infringement and intellectual property rights.
Definitions:
– NeMo: Nvidia’s AI platform used for simulating ordinary written language.
– Copyright infringement: the unauthorized use of copyrighted material without permission from the copyright owner.
– Dataset: a collection of data used for training AI algorithms or conducting research.
– Generative AI: a type of artificial intelligence that can generate new content, such as text, images, or music.
Related Link:
– Nvidia
The source of the article is from the blog regiozottegem.be