A recent review by PC Watch reveals that Intel’s new dual-core 300 CPU, despite undergoing branding changes, performs remarkably similar to its predecessor, the Pentium Gold G7400. While the 300 CPU is a decent option, reaching 60 FPS or above in three out of four tested games, it doesn’t present a significant upgrade deserving of a new branding.
The Intel 300 CPU aligns with the introduction of Intel’s Meteor Lake CPUs, but it actually utilizes the same Alder Lake chip found in the Pentium Gold G7400. In essence, the 300 CPU is essentially a name change rather than a significant technological advancement. Both CPUs feature two cores with Hyperthreading, resulting in four total threads. The 300 CPU boasts a slight advantage with an extra 200MHz frequency and support for AVX-VNNI.
PC Watch’s review reveals that the 300 CPU’s marginal frequency boost does not have a substantial impact on performance. In many instances, both the 300 CPU and the G7400 exhibited almost identical performance, as seen in Handbrake and Cinebench 2024 benchmarks. The only notable difference emerged in gaming tests, where the 300 CPU demonstrated slightly superior performance. Surprisingly, it was able to sustain 60 FPS in all games except for Cyberpunk 2077, where it fell just short at 56 FPS. Notably, during testing, the 300 CPU maintained high CPU usage despite achieving satisfactory frame rates in games like the Resident Evil 4 remake.
PC Watch also tested the Core i3-14100, a version with a higher frequency of 4.7GHz. The Core i3-14100, with double the cores, double the cache, and a 20% higher frequency, displayed superior performance, as expected. This CPU delivered twice the speed of the 300 CPU, providing an objectively better gaming experience with a consistently high frame rate.
However, the 300 CPU does offer a distinct advantage in terms of power consumption. During testing, the 300 CPU recorded a power consumption of only 27 watts in Cyberpunk 2077, while the Core i3-14100 consumed approximately 65 watts. Additionally, the 300 CPU has an MSRP ranging from $77 to $87, whereas the Core i3-14100 and 14100F (graphics-disabled variant) are priced at $170 and $125 on Amazon, respectively.
Despite its lower price and power consumption, the Intel 300 CPU falls short when compared to the Core i3-14100 in terms of performance. At this point, the 300 CPU is not yet available for purchase, and considering the doubled performance provided by the 14100F at a modest $50 premium, it appears to be the more appealing option for budget gamers.
The source of the article is from the blog xn--campiahoy-p6a.es