In a recent lawsuit filed in Manhattan federal court, OpenAI and its financial backer Microsoft are facing legal action from nonfiction authors Nicholas Basbanes and Nicholas Gage. The authors allege that the companies misused their work to train artificial intelligence models for popular chatbot ChatGPT and other AI-based services.
The authors claim that their copyrights were infringed when several of their books were used as part of the data to train OpenAI’s GPT large language model. This proposed class action follows similar lawsuits filed by both fiction and nonfiction writers against tech companies, accusing them of using their work without permission to train AI programs.
Last week, The New York Times also sued OpenAI and Microsoft for the unauthorized use of its journalists’ work to train AI applications. This growing trend of legal action highlights the increasing concerns among authors and publishers regarding the use of their intellectual property in the development of AI technologies.
Both Basbanes and Gage, who are former journalists themselves, express their outrage at the companies’ actions. Their lawyer, Michael Richter, criticizes the companies for benefiting from their works while providing no compensation.
This lawsuit raises important questions about intellectual property rights in the age of AI. As AI technologies continue to advance, it becomes imperative to address the ethical and legal implications surrounding the use of copyrighted material. The outcome of this case could have wide-reaching consequences for both authors and technology companies alike.
Representatives for Microsoft and OpenAI have yet to respond to the allegations made in the lawsuit. It remains to be seen how the court will rule on this matter and whether there will be any significant changes to the way AI models are trained using copyrighted material.
The source of the article is from the blog kunsthuisoaleer.nl