OpenAI and Microsoft Face Authors’ Copyright Lawsuit over AI Training

Nicholas Basbanes and Nicholas Gage, prominent nonfiction authors, have filed a class action lawsuit against OpenAI and its financial backer Microsoft, accusing them of unauthorized use of their literary works in training the AI model ChatGPT. The authors claim that their books were incorporated into the dataset for training OpenAI’s GPT large language model without their consent, resulting in copyright infringement.

Echoing similar legal actions taken by other writers, including Sarah Silverman and George R.R. Martin, against tech firms for alleged misuse of their work in training AI programs, Basbanes and Gage argue that it is unfair for companies to benefit from their creations without compensating them.

In a separate but related development, Google is also facing a significant lawsuit filed by the Clarkson Law Firm. The lawsuit alleges that Google, Alphabet, and its AI subsidiary DeepMind engaged in data scraping from millions of users without consent, violating copyright laws in training their AI products.

One of the key points of contention in the lawsuit against Google is the company’s recent privacy policy update, which explicitly mentions the use of publicly accessible information to train AI models like Bard. However, the lawsuit raises concerns about the potential exploitation of private data and questions the extent of Google’s practices.

The Clarkson team recently amended their complaint in response to Google’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit. The amendment introduces public plaintiffs, including best-selling author Jill Leovy, who advocate for the millions allegedly affected by copyright infringements. The amended complaint also adds fresh claims, asserting that Google violated the ownership and property rights of third-party websites by scraping user data.

Overall, these legal actions highlight the ongoing debate surrounding the use of copyrighted material for training AI models. As AI technology continues to advance, the ethical and legal implications of using intellectual property must be carefully examined and addressed.

The source of the article is from the blog meltyfan.es

Privacy policy
Contact