In a recent interview, bestselling author Tanuj Solanki expressed his concerns about the use of ChatGPT and its potential repercussions for writers. Solanki argues that if large language models like ChatGPT are going to utilize writers’ work, there should be some form of compensation or personalized service provided in return. He believes that without proper legal and operational considerations, the overestimation of ChatGPT’s capabilities could render writers redundant.
Another author, Shruti Buddharavapu, shares a similar viewpoint, stating that although she doesn’t believe AI-generated content will threaten human writing in the long run, it may eventually create a divide between AI and human-written content. She worries about the relevance of her job as a writing coach, as organizations may find AI-generated content more profitable and accessible.
On the other hand, AM Gautam sees the use of ChatGPT as unethical, emphasizing that writers should be asked for consent and appropriately compensated for their contributions. He believes that the current trend of writing for algorithms and SEO purposes already undermines the creativity and unique storytelling abilities of human writers.
While some writers are experimenting with ChatGPT to create stories, others remain skeptical about the impact of AI on their profession. Award-winning journalist Radhika Iyengar prompted ChatGPT to create a story about a mouse and a chicken. The output generated by ChatGPT demonstrates its ability to generate stories, but it also raises questions about the originality and authenticity of AI-generated content.
In conclusion, the use of tools like ChatGPT raises important concerns about the future of writing and the role of human writers. While AI technology has its benefits, it is crucial to ensure that writers are recognized and compensated for their contributions to avoid rendering them redundant in the face of advancing technology.
The source of the article is from the blog klikeri.rs