China’s Ministry of Science and Technology has recently announced a set of guidelines aimed at regulating the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in research projects. The move is seen as an effort to address potential threats to scientific integrity and ensure the responsible use of this rapidly evolving technology.
Under the newly released guidelines, researchers in China are now prohibited from using generative AI to “directly generate” research project applications. This restriction requires that project applications be written and submitted by human researchers, minimizing potential biases or inaccuracies that can arise from the use of AI-generated content.
In addition, the guidelines also restrict the inclusion of generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, as co-authors of scientific papers. This measure is aimed at maintaining transparency and accountability in scientific research, ensuring that human contributors are credited appropriately for their work.
Furthermore, the use of unverified references generated by AI is also discouraged under the guidelines. This encourages researchers to rely on verified and peer-reviewed sources, minimizing the potential for inaccuracies or misinformation to be introduced into scientific publications.
The implementation of these regulations reflects China’s commitment to maintaining the integrity and ethical standards of scientific research in the face of rapidly advancing AI technologies. While AI has shown immense potential in various fields, the guidelines serve as a necessary precautionary measure to ensure that scientific research remains accurate, reliable, and free from undue influence.
It is expected that these regulations will encourage researchers in China to adopt responsible practices when using generative AI in their projects. By prioritizing human involvement and the rigor of scientific methodology, China’s Ministry of Science and Technology aims to strike a balance between leveraging the benefits of AI and upholding the foundations of scientific integrity.
The source of the article is from the blog trebujena.net