A new bill titled “Protecting and Preserving Original Content from Deepfakes and Edits Act” (PPCODE) has been introduced to the US Senate by Senators Marsha Blackburn, Maria Cantwell, and Martin Heinrich. If passed, PPCODE aims to empower the National Institute of Standards and Technology to develop transparent standards, including guidelines for identifying information authenticity, watermarking, and synthesized content.
Furthermore, PPCODE prohibits unauthorized use of creative or journalistic content for training AI models or generating AI-generated content. The Federal Trade Commission and state Attorneys General would be responsible for enforcing the provisions of PPCODE. Individuals whose legally created content is misused by AI without consent or fair compensation would have the right to sue responsible companies or entities.
The bill also expands the prohibition on deepfakes or tampering with content source information on internet platforms, search engines, and social media companies. Numerous advocacy groups in the US have voiced support for turning PPCODE into law, including prominent organizations like the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, the Recording Industry Association of America, the National Association of Broadcasters, the American Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers, and the National Press Association.
PPCODE is not the first legislative effort in the US Senate aimed at establishing guidelines and regulations for the increasing use of AI-generated content. In April, lawmakers introduced a bill requiring companies using AI technology to disclose copyright sources for their datasets, although this bill has yet to be enacted into law.
A new bill titled “Protecting and Preserving Original Content from Deepfakes and Edits Act” (PPCODE) has been introduced to the US Senate by Senators Marsha Blackburn, Maria Cantwell, and Martin Heinrich. If passed, PPCODE aims to empower the National Institute of Standards and Technology to develop transparent standards, including guidelines for identifying information authenticity, watermarking, and synthesized content.
Furthermore, PPCODE prohibits unauthorized use of creative or journalistic content for training AI models or generating AI-generated content. The Federal Trade Commission and state Attorneys General would be responsible for enforcing the provisions of PPCODE. Individuals whose legally created content is misused by AI without consent or fair compensation would have the right to sue responsible companies or entities.
The bill also expands the prohibition on deepfakes or tampering with content source information on internet platforms, search engines, and social media companies. Numerous advocacy groups in the US have voiced support for turning PPCODE into law, including prominent organizations like the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, the Recording Industry Association of America, the National Association of Broadcasters, the American Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers, and the National Press Association.
PPCODE is not the first legislative effort in the US Senate aimed at establishing guidelines and regulations for the increasing use of AI-generated content. In April, lawmakers introduced a bill requiring companies using AI technology to disclose copyright sources for their datasets, although this bill has yet to be enacted into law.
Additional Important Information:
Key Questions:
1. How will PPCODE define and differentiate between legitimate and unauthorized uses of human-created content by AI?
2. What measures will be in place to ensure the transparency and effectiveness of the standards developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology?
3. How will the Federal Trade Commission and state Attorneys General collaborate to enforce the provisions of PPCODE?
Challenges and Controversies:
While the intention behind PPCODE is to safeguard human-created content from misuse by AI, there are several challenges and controversies associated with its implementation:
1. Balancing Innovation with Regulation: Striking a balance between encouraging AI innovation and preventing its misuse without stifling technological advancements.
2. Privacy Concerns: Ensuring that the measures taken to protect human-created content do not intrude on individual privacy rights or limit the free flow of information.
3. Enforcement Issues: Addressing the practical challenges of enforcing PPCODE, especially when dealing with international entities or platforms that may not fall under direct US jurisdiction.
Advantages:
– Protection of Intellectual Property: PPCODE can help creators protect their original content from unauthorized AI use, preserving their intellectual property rights.
– Establishing Clear Guidelines: The bill can set clear standards and guidelines for the use of AI in relation to human-created content, reducing ambiguity and potential exploitation.
– Legal Recourse for Content Owners: Providing content creators with the legal means to seek compensation or take action against entities that misuse their work through AI technologies.
Disadvantages:
– Compliance Costs: Companies and organizations may face increased compliance costs associated with adhering to the regulations outlined in PPCODE.
– Potential Limitations on AI Development: Stricter regulations could potentially hinder the development and application of AI technologies, impacting sectors reliant on AI advancements.
– Uncertainties in Implementation: The practical implementation of PPCODE, including enforcement mechanisms and international cooperation, could pose challenges and uncertainties.
For more information on similar legislative efforts and developments in the realm of AI regulation, visit the official U.S. Congress website.
The source of the article is from the blog japan-pc.jp